Visit The Syria Report Subscribe to our mailing list
EN ع
  • Twitter
Syria Report
  • Green Tabu
    • Issues
    • Updates
    • Analysis
    • Policy Briefs
    • Interviews
  • Archive
    • All articles
    • News
    • Analysis & Features
    • Reports & Papers
    • Regulations
    • Directory
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Home1 / Syrian_interim_government2

Posts

Earthquake Committees in SIG-Controlled Areas

06-06-2023/in HLP, News /by Rand Shamaa

Engineering committees that were formed by the Free Syrian Engineers’ Syndicate in northern Syria will work until the end of June to inspect and assess damages caused by the February 6 earthquake. The work comes as part of a comprehensive survey project for buildings and other facilities aimed at inspecting damages to private, public and governmental buildings as well as services in areas controlled by the Turkish-backed Syrian Interim Government (SIG). 

According to Khaled Al-Othman, head of the Free Syrian Engineers’ Syndicate branch in Aleppo, the survey project began on February 16, 2023, after the initial emergency response period to the earthquake had ended. The project includes 27 “comprehensive survey committees”, each consisting of three engineers, one of whom is a structural consulting engineer to serve as the team leader. 

As of May 29, 2023, the committees have inspected 33,087 buildings in the rural northern part of Aleppo governorate, covering 82 cities, towns, villages and settlements. Of those buildings, two percent were fully destroyed; three percent were severely damaged; 19 percent were moderately damaged; 38 percent were slightly damaged; and 38 percent were still safe. The committees also inspected 105 schools as of May 29, one of which was fully destroyed. Eight schools were severely damaged and 30 were moderately damaged. 

The syndicate also formed three public safety committees tasked with studying the results and reports of the comprehensive survey committees, though only for the buildings that were classified as severely damaged. Afterward, these public safety committees will reinspect the buildings and give their final engineering opinion on whether they should be demolished, removed and their rubble cleared away; or whether the buildings can remain and undergo reinforcement. The three public safety committees are distributed geographically between Azaz, Afrin and Jandares. 

As of May 29, these public safety committees had reassessed 609 of the 992 buildings classified as severely damaged. They transferred the results of these assessments to the demolition and removal committees of various local councils, which have the final say on whether to demolish the buildings. Those demolition committees are composed of three consulting engineers from the Free Syrian Engineers Syndicate, as well as a lawyer and two representatives from the relevant local council and public prosecution. 

So far the demolition and removal committee in Jandares has demolished 39 buildings, 25 of which were done as part of a partnership between local councils and NGOs, and 13 in partnership with the Syrian Civil Defence (also known as the White Helmets). Meanwhile, during the same period, the committee in Afrin demolished and removed three buildings. Some of these demolitions were full in scope and meant tearing down the entire structure, while others were only partial and preserved some parts of the buildings that were still intact and would not be impacted by the demolition of damaged sections — especially ground storeys and basements. 

Through consulting engineers who are members of these demolition and removal committees, the role of the Free Syrian Engineers Syndicate has been to suggest appropriate methods for demolition of each building. The syndicate is also meant to monitor the demolition process in order to maintain public safety and the safety of neighbouring buildings. 

Notably, the Free Syrian Lawyers Syndicate, which is active in opposition-held areas, did not play a key role in following up on the earthquake’s impacts to housing, land and property rights. Instead, the syndicate has been limited to its usual rights and judicial roles, without connection to the demolition of earthquake-damaged buildings, Syndicate Council Secretary Youssef Al-Hussein told The Syria Report. However, lawyers who are members of the syndicate have participated on an individual level in the demolition and removal committees by following up on the legal conditions for those impacted by the damage and helping them obtain documents confirming their rights.  

The Free Engineers Syndicate, meanwhile, is working on a set of standards and criteria for proper building reinforcement methods. They held an engineering conference at the Free University of Aleppo for this purpose on April 5 where participants presented and discussed various studies and research papers. The conference decided to adopt the Syrian Arab Code for the Design and Implementation of Reinforced Concrete Structures and its earthquakes appendix, as well as recommendations related to studies on reinforcement. Such studies are meant to be done separately for each building, and the responsibility for structural reinforcement lies with the local councils and at the expense of the property owners.

In this context, the Jandares local council issued a decision on May 31 stating that any cracked building that undergoes reinforcement without the council’s approval would be considered unlicensed construction. This decision was meant to ensure the application of proper standards for reinforcing cracked buildings, as well as the need for engineering committees to supervise such work. 

Meanwhile, Civil Defence teams have nearly finished removing the rubble of buildings damaged by the earthquake, in accordance with the comprehensive action plan announced on March 9. Deputy Civil Defence Director Mounir Al-Mustafa told The Syria Report that the organisation’s teams have almost finished removing the rubble, and so far have cleared away more than 400,000 square metres of debris from more than 120,000 residential communities. They have also cleared roads in 197 residential communities and done 540 projects to remove cracked walls or roofs in 99 communities. Finally, they have prepared and filled 303,519 square metres of land in SIG-controlled areas. with rubble left behind by the earthquake after recycling it.  

https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png 0 0 Rand Shamaa https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png Rand Shamaa2023-06-06 21:12:382023-06-07 08:00:59Earthquake Committees in SIG-Controlled Areas

Industrial Zones in Opposition-Held Territory

23-05-2023/in HLP, News /by Rand Shamaa

Recent years have seen industrial zones established on agricultural lands in rural northern parts of the Aleppo governorate controlled by the Syrian Interim Government (SIG). These zones are spread out across the countryside outside Al-Bab, Al-Rai, Azaz, Jarablus, Maraa, and Souran and are known as industrial cities. 

Legislative Decree No. 57 of 2004 regarding the establishment of industrial cities in Syria, as well as Legislative Decree No. 22 of 2013, which amended it, stipulated establishing just four industrial cities: the Sheikh Najjar Industrial City in Aleppo governorate, the Hasya Industrial City in Homs governorate, the Adra Industrial City in Rural Damascus governorate and another one in Deir-ez-Zor governorate. Under Decree No. 22, these industrial cities are legal entities with financial and administrative independence. However, they are affiliated with the Ministry of Local Administration. They are treated as if they were actual cities managed by a city council and a governor. Members of these city councils include the relevant governorate’s finance directors, electricity companies and service directorates. Later, these industrial cities were run under the provisions of Local Administration Law No. 107 of 2011. Decree No. 22 also authorises the establishment of new industrial cities based on proposals by the minister and per regional planning trends and regulatory principles for urban planning. Decree No. 57 affirmed that administrative entities must complete the infrastructure for industrial cities and equip them with all the needed services and facilities such as electricity, water, roads, sewage networks, communications, civil defence centres, police, rehabilitation and training centres and medical centres. This all comes before licensing the area’s subdivisions and offering them for investment. 

Meanwhile, the regulations for industrial zones are subject to various laws, the latest of which is Prime Ministerial Decision No. 66 of 2018 on the system for establishing, implementing and investing in industrial and craft zones within administrative units. Under Decision No. 66, industrial zones should be on lands owned by the state or local administrative units or on confiscated lands. This Decision also stipulated that the implementing party comply with the approved general and detailed zoning plans for the area, following regional planning guidelines. Decision No. 66 did not grant independent legal status to industrial zones, instead classifying them as falling within local administrative units. 

Authorities in opposition-held areas in Syria no longer adhere to the laws and decrees most recently issued by Damascus. However, according to the previous and existing laws, the newly established industrial clusters in rural northern Aleppo governorate cannot be considered industrial cities but industrial zones. These zones were built on agricultural lands where construction was not permitted according to the local zoning plans. Some of these lands were privately owned, purchased from the owners and converted into multiple subdivisions designated for construction, as in Maraa and Souran. Others were built on abandoned public lands where local residents were entitled to usufruct, such as in the case of Al-Rai and Azaz. 

Further, those constructing these industrial zones did not consider their location concerning neighbouring residential communities. Under Decision No. 66, local administrative units must choose the site of an industrial zone after considering the zoning principles, environmental criteria and proximity to residential communities. Such zones must not be expanded on agricultural lands, as this would violate housing, land, and property rights due to damage to agricultural lands and neighbouring residential communities. 

Decision No. 66 also required local administrative units to put zoning and subdivision plans for industrial zones that comply with the general zoning plans and allow multi-storey buildings to accommodate industrial production. However, the new industrial zones in rural northern Aleppo did not consider the area’s general zoning plans, despite having their own specific plans. This means a total deviation from such zoning plans and construction of buildings without adhering to technical conditions on agricultural lands, which might not be suitable for multi-storey construction. 

Furthermore, the plots within these new industrial zones were sold without imposing special conditions on the buyers. Instead, buyers were enticed to make the purchases by being granted commercial entry into Turkey if they agreed to set up their facilities within these industrial zone plots. As a result, most buyers ended up simply reselling their plots as they intended to profit and obtain commercial entry permits into Turkey. More than half of the plots within these new industrial zones have, as a result, remained without constructing any industrial facilities on them. Decree No. 22 prohibited selling unconstructed plots within industrial cities more than once after fully paying their value to the industrial city. Buyers were also required to commit to building on their plots according to the regulations of the industrial city. Selling subdivisions after the completion of construction is allowed with the approval of the industrial city management. 

https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png 0 0 Rand Shamaa https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png Rand Shamaa2023-05-23 22:27:472023-05-31 01:40:28Industrial Zones in Opposition-Held Territory

Read also

  • A quarterly journal on housing, land and property rights in Syria – Issue 1
  • Reconstruction and the Right to Housing in Syria: Toward a Transitional Policy that Protects Property and Reduces Real Estate Investment Risks
  • Ministry of Endowments Opens the Waqf Property File: Drawing on Ottoman Waqf Records and Reappraising Rents
  • Yazidi Villages in Hassakeh: Protracted Displacement and Property Seizure
LinkedIn Logo Twitter Logo
HelpAbout usContact usAdvertise with The Syria ReportTerms & conditions
Copyright © 2026 The Syria Report – all rights reserved. Your use of this website is subject to our legal terms & conditions
Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Ok

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

en_USEnglish
en_USEnglish