This paper approaches major real estate development projects as a test of how reconstruction is managed in Syria, rather than merely as investment or urban development projects. When land and property become a means of attracting finance and reactivating assets, protecting housing, land, and property rights becomes a necessary condition for preventing investment from turning into a tool for redistributing space and value outside a clear rights-based process.
Legislative Decree No. 66 of 2012 was issued as a tool for rezoning large areas of unlicensed and informal housing in Damascus. Over more than a decade, however, it has become one of Syria’s most sensitive property and housing issues. The problem is no longer confined to an urban plan or an administrative delay, but lies in a lengthy process that changed the very form of the right itself: from direct ownership of a property to zoning shares, from an existing home to a promise of alternative housing, and from property available for everyday use to a right requiring proof, valuation, allocation, financing and years of waiting. Decree No. 66 has thus become a test of how rights are produced within a reconstruction project before it is a test of the ability to construct buildings, roads and infrastructure.
The property rights crisis in Suweida now unfolds through several channels, beginning with death registration and extending to Estate Inheritance Inventory Documents (EIIDs), powers of attorney, sales and ownership transfers. Since the July 2025 massacre, victims’ families have faced obstacles in registering deaths and amending family civil registration records, preventing heirs from obtaining the documents needed to deal with inherited property. Then, on 20 May 2026, the Ministry of Justice issued Decision No. 1475, freezing most judicial, property and notarisation transactions in the governorate. The ministry presented the decision as a measure to protect property rights, but its broad application closed the legal channels residents, expatriates and heirs need to manage their property. With no clear time limit for the freeze and no exceptions for urgent cases, ownership remains recorded in the Land Registry while the ability to sell property, transfer ownership or derive income from it is effectively suspended.
Legislative Decree No. 66 of 2012 was issued as a tool for rezoning large areas of unlicensed and informal housing in Damascus. Over more than a decade, however, it has become one of Syria’s most sensitive property and housing issues. The problem is no longer confined to an urban plan or an administrative delay, but lies in a lengthy process that changed the very form of the right itself: from direct ownership of a property to zoning shares, from an existing home to a promise of alternative housing, and from property available for everyday use to a right requiring proof, valuation, allocation, financing and years of waiting. Decree No. 66 has thus become a test of how rights are produced within a reconstruction project before it is a test of the ability to construct buildings, roads and infrastructure.
This paper approaches major real estate development projects as a test of how reconstruction is managed in Syria, rather than merely as investment or urban development projects. When land and property become a means of attracting finance and reactivating assets, protecting housing, land, and property rights becomes a necessary condition for preventing investment from turning into a tool for redistributing space and value outside a clear rights-based process.
The Ministry of Emergency and Disaster Management is a newly established Syrian government body responsible for coordinating national responses to emergencies, natural disasters, and humanitarian crises.
On March 13, the Damascus Governorate held a meeting to present a reconstruction project for “the revival” of the areas east of the capital, including Jobar, Qaboun, and Bab Sharqi. Around 30 people attended the meeting, including members of neighbourhood committees, dignitaries from Qaboun and Jobar (but not from Bab Sharqi), as well as lawyers and engineers.
This article offers a detailed examination of the subsequent stage of compulsory enforcement, namely the procedures for selling the property at public auction, including the mechanisms of announcement, participation requirements, the conduct of bidding sessions, assignment decisions, and the resulting legal effects on ownership and the rights of creditors and debtors.
Some stories don’t fit into a news cycle. Housing, land and property rights in Syria are exactly that kind of tale, sprawling across legal texts, official sources, field reporting and institutional publications, and rarely brought together in one place, with the depth they deserve. That’s why we’re launching Green Tabu, Syria’s first HLP journal. Read its first issue here.
What does it mean to destroy not just a city, but the very conditions that make return possible? Spatial planner Marh Echtai examines the July 2025 assault on Suweida through the interlocking frameworks of urbicide, domicide, and ecocide, arguing that the violence visited upon the Druze community was not a security operation gone wrong, but a deliberate, layered strategy of spatial erasure.
The local council in the city of Ayn Tarma in Rural Damascus has proposed a new revision to the master plan based on expanding the city’s boundaries and increasing urban density. This will be done by incorporating unzoned areas and allowing the construction of residential towers, with an increase in the number of permitted storeys, and permitting the construction of residential towers throughout the entire city and not only in the damaged areas.
Syria’s Transitional President, Ahmad Al-Sharaa, issued Decree No. 57 on March 8, forming a national committee to rehabilitate infrastructure in heavily damaged areas. The aim is to allow displaced people to return, as well as to close various displacement camps, amid growing criticism directed at the government due to the deteriorating conditions in the camps and the decline in support from international organisations.
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
Essential Website Cookies
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
Other external services
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.