Visit The Syria Report Subscribe to our mailing list
EN ع
  • Twitter
Syria Report
  • Green Tabu
    • Issues
    • Updates
    • Analysis
    • Policy Briefs
    • Interviews
  • Archive
    • All articles
    • News
    • Analysis & Features
    • Reports & Papers
    • Regulations
    • Directory
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Home1 / extortion2

Posts

Government Seizes Dissidents’ Properties in Suweida

08-10-2024/in HLP, News /by Rand Shamaa

Syria’s Minister of Finance issued on May 23 Decision No. 1229/Q, ordering the precautionary seizure of assets belonging to 15 peaceful activists in the town of Al-Quraya, south of Suweida. This marks the first time peaceful activists in Suweida have been targeted by a precautionary property seizure order, citing their alleged involvement in what the decision referred to as “the ongoing events in the country.” This vague phrase highlights the extent to which the Syrian regime can violate housing, land, and property rights by using exceptional punitive measures against its peaceful political opponents.

None of the activists had been officially informed of the decision, a correspondent for The Syria Report explained. They only became aware of it when one of them attempted to open a bank account a few weeks ago and found a precautionary seizure order on both their movable and immovable assets, preventing them from opening a bank account. The decision was not published in the Official Gazette, which instead included in its second part of Issue No. 26 of 2024, a different decision with the same number, 1229, but without the suffix /Q. This decision, issued by the Customs Directorate of the Ministry of Finance, lifted a precautionary seizure order on certain individuals involved in a smuggling case.

The Ministry of Finance was granted the authority to impose “administrative” precautionary seizures, distinct from court-ordered seizures, under Legislative Decree No. 12 of 1953. This decree applied to the assets of employees and accountants of all state administrations and institutions to enable the state to secure compensation for losses or damages caused through the mistakes or negligence of these employees. Later, this authority was expanded to include the movable and immovable assets of non-employees and their spouses under Legislative Decree No. 177 of 1969.

The Minister of Finance’s decision on May 23 was based on letter No. 7777, issued the day before by Branch 285 of the General Intelligence Directorate (State Security), which requested the seizure of these activists’ property. The Suweida Financial Directorate received the Minister’s decision on May 27, 2024, just days after the Intelligence Directorate’s letter was sent to the Ministry of Finance. This unprecedented haste in issuing the provisional seizure order underscores the significance of the matter for Syrian security authorities.

The Minister of Finance’s decision also relied on the provisions of the Judicial Police Authority Law No. 63 of 2012. Under Law No. 63 of 2012, the judicial police authorities can request in writing that the Minister of Finance take precautionary measures against the property of those accused of terrorism, as part of investigations related to crimes against the internal or external security of the state, and crimes listed in the Counter-Terrorism Law No. 19 of 2012. Law No. 63 also grants the Public Prosecutor and the investigating judge, while handling a case, the right to take these precautionary measures against the accused, or the defendant, including travel bans, until a final judicial ruling is issued.

The Syria Report’s correspondent confirmed that all those affected by the decision are regular participants in the peaceful opposition movement in Suweida, which has been ongoing since August 2023. This is the first time a collective precautionary seizure order of this type has been issued against activists because of their involvement in the peaceful movement in Suweida. The activists are consulting with lawyers to explore how to challenge the decision. Those affected by the decision have the right to appeal it and take legal action against the Minister of Finance within eight days of being notified. However, to date, they have not been officially notified.

The correspondent explained that most of the activists included in the decision had “security investigation notices” issued against them by the General Intelligence Directorate over the past year. A security investigation notice is a formal communication sent to police units and security agencies with the names of individuals wanted for questioning, detention, or arrest. These notices were issued based on security reports filed by informants from the town, accusing the activists of participating in converting the local branch of the Arab Socialist Baath Party in Al-Quraya into a community centre, as well as participating in the general strike, road blockades, protests, and other forms of peaceful opposition in the town.

In the 1980s, Abu Ghaleb Zeid Al-Atrash, one of the leaders of the Great Syrian Revolt of 1923–1925, donated a plot of private land he owned to be transformed into a community centre that would house the town’s consumer and agricultural cooperatives. The townspeople raised donations to build a two-storey building, but the Baath Party took over the building immediately after its completion, seizing it by force and turning it into an office. On September 3, 2023, the townspeople, including some of the activists affected by the seizure order, reclaimed the building and announced its conversion into the Sultan Pasha Al-Atrash Community Centre. Since then, it has hosted various social activities, including educational courses for secondary and middle school students.

Those subject to the precautionary seizure are unable to dispose of their property, such as selling or passing it on through inheritance, and most of their dealings with state institutions are disrupted, including being denied access to the government support system. The Public Prosecutor and the investigating judge, while handling the case, also have the right to take these measures against the accused or defendant, including imposing a travel ban, until the charges are proven by a final judicial ruling. A precautionary seizure decision can only be cancelled by a “lifting of the precautionary seizure” order issued by the Minister of Finance, after the reason for the seizure is revoked. In this case, the reason is the letter from the General Intelligence Directorate, an entity that the judiciary has no authority over.

Since August 2023, Al-Quraya has seen notable peaceful opposition activity against the regime, where activists organised protests and evening gatherings, singing songs and raising banners. In August 2023, Al-Quraya activists blocked the road to prevent Fawzat Shaqir, the retired Major General and Baath Party branch secretary in Suweida, who is also from Al-Quraya, from reaching his workplace at the party’s branch office in Suweida city.

Like the rest of the Suweida governorate, Al-Quraya suffers from a severe water shortage due to the frequent breakdowns of water pumps installed on wells, caused by power cuts, lack of maintenance, and corruption within the municipal council. In the summer of 2024, activists exposed several cases of corruption within Al-Quraya’s town council, some of which were related to the water issue. They led a local campaign calling for the dismissal of the town’s mayor and council members, and they signed a joint statement with these demands, sending it to the governor of Suweida. This was followed by a meeting with the mayor and his deputy, where activists confronted them with the corruption files. The activists also temporarily closed the municipal council’s office for a few days, demanding new council elections.

https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png 0 0 Rand Shamaa https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png Rand Shamaa2024-10-08 21:49:022024-10-16 10:02:57Government Seizes Dissidents’ Properties in Suweida

Military Judiciary Rejects Lawsuit Reclaiming House Seized by Regime Forces in Suweida

03-09-2024/in HLP, News /by Rand Shamaa

The military judiciary and the public prosecution in Suweida have rejected a lawsuit filed by the Farhat family against the leader of the pro-regime National Defence Force militia, seeking to reclaim their family home, which has been seized for the past 10 years, and to obtain compensation for the damages caused.

The house, located on the outskirts of the village of Waqm in western rural Suweida, is owned by Ziad Farhat. He lived there with his family until 2014 when Ziad was kidnapped by an armed gang from the Lajat area in rural Daraa. The family chose to leave the house and temporarily relocate from the village after suspecting that two villagers were involved in the kidnapping. A few days after the abduction, the gang negotiated with the family to pay a ransom for Ziad’s release. The family managed to gather around SYP 600,000 (approximately USD 4,000 at the exchange rate at the time) and handed the money over to the gang’s intermediary. However, the intermediary claimed that the kidnappers intercepted him and stole his car along with the money. The family decided to move to Ashrafiyet Sahnaya in Rural Damascus and filed a lawsuit against the two suspected of involvement in Ziad’s kidnapping. Since then, contact with the kidnappers has been lost, and no information about Ziad’s fate has been available to this day.

The house covers an area of 300 square metres and is surrounded by agricultural land of about one hectare, enclosed by a wall. The house building is licensed, and the land is located in a zoned area, with both having a title deed in the name of Ziad Farhat.

Three months after the family left their home, a military group affiliated with the National Defence Force (NDF) militia stormed the house, bringing along the village mayor as a witness to the event in front of the villagers. The militia seized the house without notifying the owners or seeking their permission and turned it into a military base, citing its strategic location as justification.

In early 2015, one of Ziad Farhat’s sons visited the leader of the NDF at his headquarters in the tourist hotel in Suweida city to object to the seizure of the house and request its return. The leader stated that the house’s location was ideal for protecting the area from militants and refused to vacate it until “the security situation in the area stabilises,” as he allegedly described it. The leader verbally promised to compensate for any damages to the house resulting from the military presence.

In 2017, the family learned that the NDF had handed over the house to a unit of the regime’s 15th Division, which operates in the western rural area of Suweida. Despite the relative stability that returned to the region following the reconciliation agreement with armed opposition factions in Daraa and Quneitra in mid-2018, the 15th Division did not vacate the house.

The family avoided visiting the village during this period, until mid-2024, when one of Ziad’s sons inspected the house and found it in a disastrous state, with members of the 15th Division still occupying it. The military personnel prevented the homeowner’s son from taking photos or documenting the damage. However, according to a correspondent for The Syria Report, the house had been looted, leaving no windows, doors, floor tiles, or bathroom ceramics. Even the internal electrical wiring had been removed, and all the furniture, along with the exterior marble, had disappeared. Most painfully, 150 mature olive trees surrounding the house had been uprooted. The officer in charge, a colonel, claimed that they had received the house in this condition from the NDF.

The correspondent said that someone had written in large letters on the house’s wall, “Guardians of the Homeland, peace be upon you,” a phrase clearly visible from afar. This phrase is taken from the Syrian national anthem and is used to describe the Syrian army and its supposed role in protecting the “homeland,” which means in Arabic both homes and the nation itself.

The family approached the military judiciary in Suweida to file a lawsuit against the leader of the NDF, holding him responsible for the house’s seizure and seeking to reclaim the property and compensation for the losses incurred. However, the military judge refused to register the case and advised the family’s lawyer to mediate between them and the NDF leader to resolve the matter amicably. The leader, however, claimed that the NDF was not responsible for the damages, as the house had been handed over to the army and the Ministry of Defence.

With this mediation attempt failing, the family renewed their request to file a lawsuit with the military judge. The judge stipulated that the family must accept the house in its current state before he would register the case. The family refused to take possession of the house as it was, arguing that the extensive damage made accepting it equivalent to waiving their right to compensation, according to the correspondent.

Afterward, the family went to the Palace of Justice in Suweida, making a new attempt to file a lawsuit against the leader of the NDF and to demand an investigation into the extortion of their home. However, the public prosecutor refused to sign off on accepting the lawsuit. It turned out that the public prosecutor is the brother of the NDF leader. The prosecutor claimed he would personally follow up on the case and promised to send a lawyer to the house to verify the complaint.

A few days later, the family received threats from the NDF, warning that family members would be arrested. As a result of similar pressure, the family’s lawyer felt compelled to withdraw from the case.

Faced with these complications and threats, the family became fearful of pursuing their rights through legal channels, knowing that their opponent is the leader of an armed militia and his brother is the public prosecutor. Consequently, the family recently turned to local elders and leaders in Suweida, seeking their mediation with the NDF to reach a solution that would allow them to reclaim their home and receive compensation for the damages incurred.

 

https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png 0 0 Rand Shamaa https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png Rand Shamaa2024-09-03 19:59:002024-09-03 19:59:00Military Judiciary Rejects Lawsuit Reclaiming House Seized by Regime Forces in Suweida

Read also

  • A quarterly journal on housing, land and property rights in Syria – Issue 1
  • Reconstruction and the Right to Housing in Syria: Toward a Transitional Policy that Protects Property and Reduces Real Estate Investment Risks
  • Ministry of Endowments Opens the Waqf Property File: Drawing on Ottoman Waqf Records and Reappraising Rents
  • Yazidi Villages in Hassakeh: Protracted Displacement and Property Seizure
LinkedIn Logo Twitter Logo
HelpAbout usContact usAdvertise with The Syria ReportTerms & conditions
Copyright © 2026 The Syria Report – all rights reserved. Your use of this website is subject to our legal terms & conditions
Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Ok

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

en_USEnglish
en_USEnglish