Visit The Syria Report Subscribe to our mailing list
EN ع
  • Twitter
Syria Report
  • Green Tabu
    • Issues
    • Updates
    • Analysis
    • Policy Briefs
    • Interviews
  • Archive
    • All articles
    • News
    • Analysis & Features
    • Reports & Papers
    • Regulations
    • Directory
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Home1 / refugee_return2

Posts

Property Fraud and Poor Services in the Yarmouk Palestinian Refugee Camp

09-07-2024/in HLP, News /by Rand Shamaa

Recent reports of increased property fraud in the Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp in Damascus have prompted many displaced property owners to temporarily return, inspect their properties, and implement some protective measures such as installing doors and windows for houses and securing locks for shops. These individuals are required to obtain temporary security clearance to visit the camp.

Activists from the camp, including lawyer NourEddin Salman, have issued repeated warnings on social media in recent months about widespread property fraud occurring in the camp. These fraudulent activities have resulted in a surge of illicit property sales, with an increasing number of homes being sold illegally. A gang is reportedly selling many shares in undivided common properties in the area between Loubieh Street and the Yarmouk Girls’ School and has allegedly amassed around SYP 2 billion through this fraudulent and deceitful scheme, according to activists. Mr Salman advised anyone looking to purchase property in the camp to first inquire with neighbours about the seller and the property, verify ownership documents, ensure the validity of the sales contract, and obtain a current description of the property’s condition and boundaries from a court-appointed expert engineer.

Wafaa, a displaced resident of the camp now living in Damascus, learned from one of her former neighbours that a few individuals recently inspected her uninhabited house on Al-Urubah Street in the camp with the intent to buy it, according to a correspondent for The Syria Report. When Wafaa’s neighbour inquired, the individuals claimed they were there to view the house, which they said was for sale by its owner. After a discussion, the neighbour identified the person who falsely claimed ownership of Wafaa’s house and was trying to sell it. Based on this information, Wafaa filed a complaint with the Yarmouk Camp police station, which managed to detain the alleged seller who claimed ownership of her house. However, according to Wafaa, this individual was able to bribe the police officers, who then wrote in their report that the incident was a mistake rather than fraud, stating that the seller had mistakenly identified the house due to changes in the area’s landmarks caused by destruction.

Nizar, a Syrian Palestinian refugee from Yarmouk Camp currently residing in Sweden, told The Syria Report that he learned through friends still living in the camp that unknown individuals are renovating a house that belonged to Nizar’s grandfather. The house, located on Thalatheen Street, is partially damaged due to the fighting. Nizar confirmed that he has a court ruling proving his late grandfather’s ownership of the property. He added that his grandfather died in 2010, and then his father was killed in a bombing on the camp at the beginning of 2015, and consequently, the 105-square-metre house became the property of 21 heirs, including Nizar.

He noted that complications prevented them from completing the inheritance process, including the war, the siege of the camp, and the disruption of official institutions. Additionally, none of the heirs remains in Syria except for his uncle, who is disabled and unable to manage his affairs. Two of the heirs are missing, and their whereabouts are unknown.

The inheritance inventory document is the primary document used to determine the names of the deceased’s heirs, their relationship to the deceased, and their respective shares of the inheritance. This document can only be issued after the death of the testator, the registration of their death in the civil registry, and the issuance of a death certificate and a family record for the heirs. After this, the relevant court can be approached to obtain the inheritance certificate. The court then appoints an expert to identify the heirs and their shares of the estate.

Nizar pointed out that those renovating his grandfather’s property have a court-certified purchase contract for the house. He is unsure how someone without ownership was able to sell it to them. He plans to appoint a lawyer to challenge the validity of the sale contract in court.

According to The Syria Report’s correspondent, one of the common practices in the camp currently involves seizing adjacent properties or parts of them during the renovation of a specific property. This is done by encroaching on portions of neighbouring properties, exploiting the destruction and the loss of landmarks. According to activists in the camp, it appears that an influential person has usurped land next to the vegetable market on Palestine Street, which belongs to the General Authority of Palestinian Arab Refugees. The land previously contained buildings and homes that were destroyed, leaving only rubble, allowing the influential person to seize the land and build on it.

The correspondent reported that a real estate office employee in the camp mentioned that some fraud attempts were thwarted after news about them spread on social media. He added that with the increasing number of returnees to the camp, it is rare to find a neighbourhood without at least one inhabited house, which now serves as an early warning network for property owners in the same area, who often share relationships or kinship.

According to estimates by the Action Group for Palestinians of Syria in early June, approximately 50,000 people have returned to the Yarmouk Camp. Despite the concerted efforts by the returnees to improve the camp’s service conditions, they face many difficulties and challenges. For instance, the camp remains isolated from neighbouring areas, with only one entry and exit point via the Batikha roundabout in the Zahira neighbourhood.

Most areas of the camp still suffer from significant problems, such as some streets around the Yarmouk Camp cemetery and the entrance to the Zain neighbourhood (administratively part of Yalda) being flooded with sewage water from damaged and decayed pipes. Potholes abound on Safad Street, making it difficult for vehicles to pass, which hinders the return of displaced residents to the area. The lack of drinking water in many neighbourhoods and the absence of electricity limit stability in some regions. Residents of School Street have requested an electricity supply, but to no avail. Even Haifa Avenue, opposite the building of the Public Establishment for Transmission and Distribution of Electricity (PETDE), remains without electrical coverage. Residents resort to installing electric cables at their own expense in areas without electricity, but these either get stolen or removed by the PETDE, citing network infringement.

Rubble presents a major issue across most of the camp, still densely scattered in the Wasim Project, the Moroccan neighbourhoods, Safad Street, Kafr Qasim Street, and others. This problem is exacerbated by returnees clearing debris from their homes and neighbourhoods, often dumping it around the houses or transporting it to the PETDE’s land area on Thalatheen Street.

Meanwhile, the camp municipality has begun allowing owners of completely destroyed houses to remove the debris and manage it. Typically, these owners make agreements with building contractors to remove the rubble for free in exchange for the contractors taking the iron and metals from the debris to sell to metal traders.

https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png 0 0 Rand Shamaa https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png Rand Shamaa2024-07-09 17:26:582024-07-17 09:17:02Property Fraud and Poor Services in the Yarmouk Palestinian Refugee Camp

IDPs Return to Regime-Controlled Areas in Idlib and Hama

18-06-2024/in HLP, News /by Rand Shamaa

In several public statements Syrian officials have encouraged the return of Internally Displaced People (IDPs) from opposition areas in northwestern Syria to regime-controlled areas in the countryside of Idlib and Hama. However, no Syrian official has mentioned that returnees must undergo security screening by reconciliation committees as a condition for their return. The journey back is costly, and some returnees face arrest and financial extortion.

For example, Abu Burhan has been waiting for three months to obtain  a security approval for his request to return to his hometown in the eastern Idlib’s countryside. Displaced since 2020, Abu Burhan and his family reside in a refugee camp in Atma in northern Idlib. His cousin, who lives in regime-controlled areas, convinced him to apply for return through the reconciliation committee. Abu Burhan said that if he receives a security approval, he will return to work on his pistachio farm, which would provide his family with the minimum living costs, as their financial situation has become dire in the Atma camp.

Abu Burhan fears disclosing any information that might identify him, worrying about security persecution if he returns or if his return request is denied. He plans to return alone initially, leaving his family in the camp. Depending on the situation in his village, he will either return to the camp or have his family join him.

Abu Burhan’s cousin informed him that the pistachio trees on his land have yielded a very good crop this year, prompting him to take the risk of returning to harvest this season. He added that his cousin had managed to bribe a member of the committees responsible for designating absentee lands for public auctions for investment by relatives over the past few years. This allowed Abu Burhan’s cousin to harvest the pistachio crop from his land during these years. However, it wasn’t for free. Abu Burhan said his cousin always negotiated a large share of the crop’s price, exploiting his absence. “I have more rights to the harvest than my cousin. Here in the camp, I don’t have the money to buy bread to feed my family,” he said.

A significant number of those returning to regime-controlled areas are motivated by the desire to return to their farmlands, reinvest in them, and benefit from their produce. A better option than staying in the camps and enduring the harsh conditions there. According to a report by the Syria Response Coordinators team on May 31, 91.16 percent of families in northern Syria are living below the poverty line, with 40.9 percent reaching severe food insecurity. These indicators explain why forcibly displaced people in the north are seriously considering returning to regime-controlled areas despite the potential risks.

Those wishing to return to regime-controlled areas must submit a return request to the reconciliation committee, either through relatives or acquaintances or by contacting the committee directly via WhatsApp, according to a correspondent for The Syria Report. There are three regional reconciliation committees: one in Khan Sheikhoun, another in Maarat Al-Numan, and another in Abu Dhuhour. To submit the request, one must send a photo of their ID card, photos of the family record book, and indicate which family members are returning and justify why the others are not. Often, the justification is that they are outside Syria. Afterward, a committee from various security agencies reviews the request. Approval or rejection of requests usually comes within one to three months. Those whose requests are approved are given a written approval that facilitates their passage through regime checkpoints until they reach their destination.

The correspondent noted that older men are often the ones who decide to return, as young men, if they return to regime-controlled areas, must immediately join the military service, which prevents many of them from returning. Additionally, the opposition Syrian National Army  (SNA) prohibits the return of young men aged 18-30.

There is no direct route between opposition and regime-controlled areas. The return journey starts from opposition areas in Idlib and rural Aleppo to the Aoun Al-Dadat crossing between Jarablus, controlled by the Turkish-backed SNA, and Manbij, under SDF control. From the Aoun al-Dadat crossing, returnees move to the Al-Tayha crossing between SDF areas in Manbij and regime-controlled areas in Aleppo.

The cost of the return journey from Idlib to Hama via this route exceeds USD 250, not including the bribes imposed by various checkpoints controlled by different factions along the way.

Returnees must register their personal details with the military police of the SNA in the presence of two guarantors who hold ID cards issued by one of the local councils affiliated with the Syrian Interim Government (SIG). These guarantors must attest that the returnee will not join the regime’s military forces and is returning for agricultural purposes.

Returnees can bring whatever luggage and furniture they wish, but they must send a description of their belongings to the reconciliation committee for registration and make them known to regime checkpoints upon their return so that these belongings don’t get confiscated. They must also specify whether they are returning in their own vehicles or rented ones. These vehicles must be registered with the transport directorates in regime-controlled areas.

Approximately 10 days after returning, the returnee will be notified by a representative of the relevant security branch in the area to report to a specific security branch for an investigation. In many cases, returnees have reported harassment and threats at these security branches, aimed at extorting money from them. One returnee to Khan Sheikhoun earlier this year said he was forced to pay about USD 20,000 to branch officers to secure his release. He confirmed that no charges were brought against him, he was not presented to a court, and he was only released after his relatives managed to raise the full amount. This is essentially kidnapping for ransom, according to the correspondent, who noted that this practice is commonly used against returnees whom the security officers know are financially capable.

https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png 0 0 Rand Shamaa https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png Rand Shamaa2024-06-18 16:55:022024-06-18 16:55:02IDPs Return to Regime-Controlled Areas in Idlib and Hama

Read also

  • A quarterly journal on housing, land and property rights in Syria – Issue 1
  • Reconstruction and the Right to Housing in Syria: Toward a Transitional Policy that Protects Property and Reduces Real Estate Investment Risks
  • Ministry of Endowments Opens the Waqf Property File: Drawing on Ottoman Waqf Records and Reappraising Rents
  • Yazidi Villages in Hassakeh: Protracted Displacement and Property Seizure
LinkedIn Logo Twitter Logo
HelpAbout usContact usAdvertise with The Syria ReportTerms & conditions
Copyright © 2026 The Syria Report – all rights reserved. Your use of this website is subject to our legal terms & conditions
Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Ok

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

en_USEnglish
en_USEnglish