Visit The Syria Report Subscribe to our mailing list
EN ع
  • Twitter
Syria Report
  • All articles
  • News
  • Analysis & Features
  • Reports & Papers
  • Regulations
  • Directory
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Home1 / HLP2 / Analysis & Features3 / Explained: Do Owners Get Their Properties Back After Cancelled Expropriations?4
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Explained: Do Owners Get Their Properties Back After Cancelled Expropriations?

16-09-2020/in Analysis & Features, HLP /by admin

In Syria, the process of expropriating private real estate for the public sector is surrounded by a strict legal framework, making cancellation and return of the properties difficult — even if the so-called “public benefit” that authorised the expropriation in the first place is no longer applicable.

Expropriation Law No. 20 of 1983 states, in Article 7, that “expropriation occurs by decree…which includes statement of the presence of public benefit,” adding that “the expropriation decree shall be final, and no method of appeal or review will be accepted.”

However, the Administrative Judiciary Court has in some cases authorised cancellation of expropriations, Syrian lawyer Muhammad Al-Sattouf told The Syria Report. The Administrative Judiciary Court is authorised to settle disputes between individuals and official administrations, as well as between public institutions.

The Administrative Judiciary Court has issued decisions in previous cases (such as Decision 32/2 in Case No. 950 of 1998, and Decision 992/2 in Case No. 2413 of 1997) to cancel expropriation in the following situations:

  • First, if the construction project planned for the expropriated property is abandoned, the expropriation loses its legitimacy.
  • Second, if the construction project is not carried out within 30 years, then the idea of “public benefit” is absent, and it is possible to request cancellation of the expropriation before the Administrative Judiciary Court.
  • Third, if it is proven that the project for which the property was expropriated does not need a specific piece of land, then the owner of that property can appeal to cancel the expropriation.
  • And finally, appeals for cancellation can be made if the expropriating party has made an error in transcribing the property’s number — for example, writing Property No. 30 instead of Property No. 40.

However, finding that public benefit is not present does not mean that the properties are then simply returned. Article 35 of Law No. 20 of 1983 explains that “if real estate is acquired for public benefit…and then that public benefit is no longer applicable to the acquired properties, that real estate is subsequently considered property of the state, and is recorded in the real estate registry, under the name of the expropriated public entity.” Still, previous rulings of the Administrative Judiciary Court indicate that property owners have the right to demand restitution of their real estate if public interest is no longer applicable, and if they have not received alternative housing or compensation for the expropriation. But if compensation has been paid, or if it has been deposited in one of the state-owned banks, then the expropriation is considered final. No method of appeals, even if public interest no longer applies to the property, is accepted, according to Article 32 of Law No. 20.

Paragraph Two of Article 32 gives priority to the original owner in re-purchasing the property, but only if the expropriated property was agricultural land and the public benefit no longer applies. Priority purchase also requires the original owner to accept the price determined by the expropriating party.

In all cases, the cancellation of an expropriation is not linked to non-payment of compensation to the original owner of the property — even if decades pass without payment. Article 25 of Law No. 20 stipulates that if the expropriating party delays compensation for more than five years, then they must pay a legal annual interest rate to the property owner of six percent for the duration of the delay. This interest rate increases to eight percent after five years have passed since the property’s seizure.

Sometimes, an expropriation decree may be approved, after which years pass before the expropriating party actually seizes the property. As a consequence, it is not possible to appeal for cancellation of the seizure simply on the basis of the fact that the expropriating party has not paid or provided compensation.

Post Views: 0
Tags: english
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png 0 0 admin https://hlp.syria-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Logo-300x81.png admin2020-09-16 23:45:002021-07-08 14:17:01Explained: Do Owners Get Their Properties Back After Cancelled Expropriations?

Read also

  • Explained: Decree Grants Tax Exemptions to People Impacted by February 6 Quake
  • Explained: Syrian Law and HLP Rights in Natural Disasters
  • Explained: Issues with the Syrian Construction Code’s Earthquakes Appendix
  • Explained: Earthquake-resistant Building Design Basics
HelpAbout usContact usAdvertise with The Syria ReportTerms & conditions
Copyright © 2022 The Syria Report – all rights reserved. Your use of this website is subject to our legal terms & conditions
تعفيش الحديد من سراقب: هل عودة السكان ممن... من يشعل النيران في الأحراج السورية؟
Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Ok

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.